口腔种植修复和常规修复在牙列缺损治疗中的临床效果
作者:
作者简介:

焉妍(1983.3-),女,山东威海人,硕士,主治医师,主要从事口腔种植、修复工作

中图分类号:

R783.4


Clinical Effect of Oral Implant Restoration and Conventional Restoration in the Treatment of Dentition Defect
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [15]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 分析牙列缺损中不同口腔修复方案的临床应用价值。方法 选取2022年1月-2023年1月烟 台市烟台山医院收治的76例牙列缺损患者为研究对象,以随机数字表法分为常规组和种植组,每组 38例。常规组采用常规修复方法,种植组采用口腔种植修复方法,比较两组临床疗效、炎症因子水 平、口腔功能及并发症发生情况。结果 种植组有效率为97.37%,高于常规组的78.95%,差异有统计 学意义(P<0.05);两组修复后CRP、TNF-α以及IL-6指标均高于修复前,但种植组低于常规组, 差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组修复后美观、咀嚼、语言功能评分均高于修复前,且种植组高于 常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);种植组并发症发生率为2.63%,低于常规组的18.42%,差异 有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 口腔种植修复安全性高,不会引起强烈的口腔炎症问题,可快速恢 复口腔功能,提高牙列缺损治疗效果。

    Abstract:

    Objective To analyze the value of different oral restoration schemes in dentition defects. Methods A total of 76 patients with dentition defect admitted to Yantai Mountain Hospital of Yantai City from January 2022 to January 2023 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into conventional group and implant group by random number table method, with 38 patients in each group. The conventional group was treated with conventional restoration methods, and the implant group was treated with oral implant restoration methods. The clinical efficacy, inflammatory factor levels, oral function and complications were compared between the two groups. Results The effective rate of the implant group was 97.37%, which was higher than 78.95% of the conventional group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The indexes of CRP, TNF-α and IL-6 in the two groups after restoration were higher than those before restoration, but those in the implant group were lower than those in the conventional group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The scores of aesthetics, chewing and language function in the two groups after restoration were higher than those before restoration, and those in the implant group were higher than the conventional group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the implant group was 2.63%, which was lower than 18.42% in the conventional group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Oral implant restoration is safe and will not cause severe oral inflammation. Meanwhile, it can quickly restore oral function and improve the effectiveness of dentition defect treatment.

    参考文献
    [1] 许伟伟,单显峰,管庆华,等.牙列缺损应用口腔种植牙 修复与常规修复治疗的临床效果比较[J].中国实用医 药,2022,17(22):84-86.
    [2] 卢伟才,蒋静琳,朱淑兴.口腔正畸联合种植义齿修复对前 牙错牙合畸形伴牙列缺损患者牙齿功能与牙周指数的影响 [J].现代医学与健康研究(电子版),2023,7(3):69-72.
    [3] 赵紫楠.口腔种植修复治疗牙列缺损患者的咀嚼功能及 其并发症分析[J].首都食品与医药,2023,30(3):56-58.
    [4] 蔡亮,窦娟,邓千里,等.数字化导板引导的口腔种植修复 术对牙列缺损患者种植精准度、牙周健康及修复美学 效果的影响[J].广西医学,2022,44(16):1836-1839.
    [5] 张兵华,宋 涛.口腔种植修复治疗牙列缺损伴牙周 炎对牙周指数及种植体存留的影响[J].中国实用医 药,2022,17(14):60-62.
    [6] 雷剑辉.《口腔种植修复》出版:牙槽突扩张术联合GBR 植骨术用于牙齿发育异常行种植牙治疗中的效果分析 [J].介入放射学杂志,2023,32(1):105.
    [7] 毛胜男.口腔种植修复治疗牙列缺损的效果及对患者语 言功能和咀嚼功能的影响[J].当代医学,2022,28(5):37-39.
    [8] 曹凯华,黄伟坚.慢性牙周炎合并牙列缺损患者行口腔种 植修复技术治疗的近远期疗效分析[J].中国现代药物应 用,2021,15(13):70-72.
    [9] 张丽娜,张楚南.隐形矫治联合种植修复在错牙合畸形伴 牙列缺损患者中的临床应用效果[J].临床口腔医学杂 志,2023,39(5):295-299.
    [10] 高二伟.口腔种植修复术对牙列缺损患者临床疗效 及龈沟液中TNF-α、IL-6表达的影响[J].黑龙江医药科 学,2021,44(6):144-145,147.
    [11] 郭胜武.用改良的口腔正畸联合种植修复疗法治疗 错颌畸形合并牙列缺损的效果探究[J].当代医药论 丛,2021,19(20):93-95.
    [12] 李鹏博,魏天祥,芦志方.口腔种植修复术中不同导板引 导方式对牙列缺损患者远期修复效果的影响[J].临床医 学研究与实践,2021,6(18):43-45.
    [13] 曾晓川.口腔种植修复术在牙列缺损中的治疗效果及 对患者龈沟液中TNF-α、IL-6水平的影响[J].中国医学创 新,2022,19(33):42-46.
    [14] 王广科,王彩霞.口腔正畸联合种植修复治疗牙列 缺损伴牙颌畸形的临床效果观察[J].宁夏医学杂 志,2022,44(4):382-384.
    [15] 杨芸芸,罗彦妮.口腔种植修复对牙列缺损患者龈沟 液炎症因子水平及咀嚼功能的影响[J].透析与人工器 官,2020,31(4):62-64.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

焉 妍,田鸿旭.口腔种植修复和常规修复在牙列缺损治疗中的临床效果[J].医学美学美容,2023,32(17):1-4.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:27
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-10-19