短波理疗仪在不同功率档位下对面肌痉挛患者疼痛程度 及面肌痉挛强度的影响
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

张方布(1975.8-),男,广东英德人,本科,主治医师,主要从事皮肤美容工作

通讯作者:

莫颖琳(1991.2-),女,广东佛山人,本科,主治医师,主要从事皮肤美容工作

中图分类号:

R745.1+2

基金项目:


Effect of Short-wave Physiotherapy Instrument with Different Power Levels on Pain Degree and Facial Spasm Intensity in Patients with Facial Spasm
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探究短波理疗仪在不同功率档位下应用于面肌痉挛患者中的效果及对疼痛程度及痉挛改善 程度的影响。方法 选取2021年10月-2022年12月于佛山市三水区疾病防治所接受短波理疗仪治疗的30例 面肌痉挛患者为研究对象,根据随机数字表法分为A组、B组、C组,每组10例。A组给予功率10 W档位, B组给予功率20 W档位、C组给予功率30 W档位,比较三组疼痛程度、面肌痉挛强度及生活质量。结果 C组 第8、16、24次治疗后及所有治疗结束后第1个月VAS评分均低于A组、B组(P<0.05);三组所有治疗结束后 第3、6个月VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);C组治疗后1、3个月面肌痉挛强度得分均低于A组 (P<0.05);三组治疗后6个月面肌痉挛强度得分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);C组第8、16、24次治 疗后及所有治疗结束后第1个月DLQI评分均低于A组(P<0.05);三组所有治疗结束后第3、6个月DLQI评分比 较,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05);三组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 短波 理疗仪在面肌痉挛患者中的应用效果确切,三种功率档位的治疗有效性及安全性均较高,但功率30 W档 位在短期内改善疼痛程度、面肌痉挛的效果更佳,有利于提高患者生活质量。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the effect of short-wave physiotherapy instrument with different power levels on patients with hemifacial spasm and its effect on pain degree and spasm improvement. Methods From October 2021 to December 2022, 30 patients with facial inflammatory diseases treated with short-wave physiotherapy instrument in Sanshui District Institute for Disease Control and Prevention of Foshan City were selected as the research objects. According to the random number table method, they were divided into group A, group B and group C, with 10 patients in each group. Group A was given a power of 10 W gear, group B was given a power of 20 W gear, and group C was given a power of 30 W gear. The pain degree, facial spasm intensity and quality of life of the three groups were compared. Results The VAS score of group C was lower than that of group A and group B after the 8th, 16th and 24th treatment and the first month after the end of all treatment (P <0.05), but there was no significant difference in VAS score among the three groups at 3 and 6 months after the end of treatment (P >0.05). The score of facial spasm intensity in group C was lower than that in group A at and 3 months after treatment (P <0.05), but there was no significant difference in the score of facial spasm intensity among the three groups at 6 months after treatment (P >0.05). The DLQI score of group C after the 8th, 16th and 24th treatment and the first month after the end of all treatment were lower than those of group A (P <0.05), but there was no significant difference in DLQI score among the three groups at 3 and 6 months after the end of treatment (P >0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions among the three groups (P >0.05). Conclusion The application effect of short-wave physiotherapy instrument in patients with hemifacial spasm is exact. The treatment effectiveness and safety of the three power levels are high, but the power 30 W level has better effect on improving pain degree and facial spasm in the short term, which is conducive to improving the quality of life of patients.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张方布,莫颖琳,余昕灿.短波理疗仪在不同功率档位下对面肌痉挛患者疼痛程度 及面肌痉挛强度的影响[J].医学美学美容,2024,33(23):82-85.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-01-02
  • 出版日期: