皮下分离技术联合超脉冲二氧化碳点阵激光治疗痤疮凹陷性瘢痕疗效的Meta分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

张健(1986.8-),男,湖北荆州人,硕士,主治医师,主要从事体表肿物切除与修复,瘢痕的光电、手术治疗工作

通讯作者:

刘艺(1986.7-),女,山东临沂人,博士研究生,主治医师,主要从事颌面部整形美容、畸形修复等的研究

中图分类号:

R758.73+3

基金项目:


Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Subcision Technology Combined with Ultra-pulsed Carbon Dioxide Fractional Laser in the Treatment of Acne Depressed Scar
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 评估皮下分离技术联合超脉冲二氧化碳点阵激光治疗痤疮凹陷性瘢痕的效果和安全性。 方法 通过检索中国知网、万方数据库、中国生物医学数据库、中华医学会、PubMed、Medline、Embase、 Cochrone数据库等,收集已经见刊发表的皮下分离技术联合超脉冲二氧化碳点阵激光对比单用超脉冲二 氧化碳点阵激光治疗痤疮凹陷性瘢痕的RCTs,检索日期不限,由3名合作者分别进行分析并筛选,应用 RevMan5.3对所纳入文献进行数据分析及发表偏倚分析。结果 共纳入14篇文献。Meta分析结果显示,试验 组总有效率优于对照组,试验组治疗后痤疮凹陷性瘢痕权重评分(ECCA评分)低于治疗前,且低于对照组 治疗后(P<0.05),而试验组治疗不良反应发生率与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 对 比单用超脉冲二氧化碳点阵激光治疗,皮下分离技术联合超脉冲二氧化碳点阵激光治疗痤疮凹陷性瘢痕的 效果更好,可改善瘢痕状况,且不增加不良反应发生率,值得临床应用。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcision technology combined with ultra-pulsed carbon dioxide fractional laser in the treatment of acne depressed scar. Methods Databases such as CNKI, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Medical Association, PubMed, Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched to collect published RCTs of subcision technology combined with ultra-pulsed carbon dioxide fractional laser compared with ultra-pulsed carbon dioxide fractional laser alone for the treatment of acne depressed scar. The search date was not limited, and three collaborators independently performed the analysis and screening. RevMan 5.3 was used for data analysis and publication bias analysis of the included literatures. Results A total of 14 literatures were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the total effective rate of the experimental group was better than that of the control group, the ECCA score of the experimental group after treatment was lower than that before treatment and lower than that of the control group after treatment (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the experimental group and the control group (P >0.05). Conclusion Compared with the treatment of ultra-pulsed carbon dioxide fractional laser alone, subcision technology combined with ultra-pulsed carbon dioxide fractional laser is more effective in the treatment of acne depressed scars, which can improve the scar condition, and the incidence of adverse reactions will not increase significantly. It is worthy of clinical application.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张 健,王文静,刘 艺.皮下分离技术联合超脉冲二氧化碳点阵激光治疗痤疮凹陷性瘢痕疗效的Meta分析[J].医学美学美容,2025,34(5):39-.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-03-31
  • 出版日期: