超皮秒激光和剥脱性CO2点阵激光联合皮下分离术治疗萎缩性痤疮 瘢痕的有效性与安全性
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

谭鉴光(1981.9-),男,广东阳江人,本科,副主任医师,主要从事皮肤与性病学方面工作

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R619+.6

基金项目:

阳江市医疗卫生科技计划项目(编号:SF2024066)


Efficacy and Safety of Picosecond Laser Combined with Ablative CO₂ Fractional Laser and Subcision in the Treatment of Atrophic Acne Scar
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 观察超皮秒激光和剥脱性CO2点阵激光联合皮下分离术治疗萎缩性痤疮瘢痕的有效性与安 全性。方法 选取我院2023年1月-2024年4月收治的90例萎缩性痤疮瘢痕患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表 法分为对照组1、对照组2和试验组,各30例。对照组1予以皮下分离术治疗,对照组2予以超皮秒激光联合 剥脱性CO2点阵激光治疗,试验组予以超皮秒激光和剥脱性CO2点阵激光联合皮下分离术治疗,比较三组 治疗效果、ECCA评分以及疼痛情况与不良反应发生情况。结果 试验组治疗后3个月VSS评分均低于对照 组1、对照组2,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组治疗后ECCA评分低于对照组1、对照组2,差异有统 计学意义(P <0.05),三组VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);对照组1、对照组2、试验组不良 反应发生率分别为10.00%、20.00%、13.33%,三组组间两两比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 超 皮秒激光和剥脱性CO2点阵激光联合皮下分离术治疗萎缩性痤疮瘢痕在治疗效果方面优于皮下分离术治疗 及超皮秒激光联合剥脱性CO2点阵激光治疗,且该方法不会增加患者术后不良反应发生几率以及疼痛感, 可加速患者恢复,值得临床应用。

    Abstract:

    Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of picosecond laser combined with ablative CO? fractional laser and subcision in the treatment of atrophic acne scar. Methods A total of 90 patients with atrophic acne scar admitted to our hospital from January 2023 to April 2024 were selected as the research subjects. According to the random number table method, they were divided into control group 1, control group 2 and experimental group, with 30 patients in each group. Control group 1 was treated with subcision, control group 2 was treated with picosecond laser combined with ablative CO? fractional laser, and the experimental group was treated with picosecond laser combined with ablative CO? fractional laser and subcision. The treatment effect, ECCA score, pain condition and adverse reactions were compared among the three groups. Results After 3 months of treatment, the VSS score of the experimental group was lower than that of control group 1 and control group 2, and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The ECCA score of the experimental group after treatment was lower than that of control group 1 and control group 2, and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the VAS score among the three groups (P >0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in control group 1, control group 2, and the experimental group was 10.00%, 20.00%, and 13.33% respectively, and there was no significant difference in pairwise comparisons among the three groups (P >0.05). Conclusion The application of picosecond laser combined with ablative CO? fractional laser and subcision in treatment of atrophic acne scar is superior to subcision alone and the combination of picosecond laser and ablative CO? fractional laser in terms of therapeutic effect. This method will not increase the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions and pain in patients, and accelerate the recovery of patients, which is worthy of clinical application.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

谭鉴光,谭玲俏,林彩娟.超皮秒激光和剥脱性CO2点阵激光联合皮下分离术治疗萎缩性痤疮 瘢痕的有效性与安全性[J].医学美学美容,2025,34(9):173-177.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-06-09
  • 出版日期: