眼轮匝肌“窗口法”切开重睑成形术与传统Park法重睑术的效果比较
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

赵羿杉(1987.12-),女,新疆乌鲁木齐人,本科,主治医师,主要从事美容外科相关工作

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R622

基金项目:


Comparison of Effects Between the "Window Method" of Orbicularis Oculi Muscle Incision and the Traditional Park Method for Double Eyelid Surgery
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 比较眼轮匝肌“窗口法”切开重睑成形术与传统Park法重睑术的效果。方法 选取2024年 2月-2025年5月于华美整形美容医院美容外科接受重睑术的76例患者为研究对象,依据手术方式差异分 为参照组和试验组,各38例。参照组实施传统Park法重睑术,试验组实施眼轮匝肌“窗口法”切开重睑 成形术,比较两组手术相关指标、眼睑情况、美容满意度、并发症发生率。结果 试验组手术时间、拆线 时间、术后康复时间短于参照组,术中出血量、瘢痕评分低于参照组(P <0.05);试验组术后7 d眼裂高 度、上睑提肌肌力高于参照组,眼睑宽度低于参照组(P<0.05);试验组美容满意度(94.74%)高于参照 组(76.32%)(P<0.05);试验组并发症发生率(2.63%)低于参照组(18.42%)(P<0.05)。结论 相较 于传统Park法重睑术,眼轮匝肌“窗口法”切开重睑成形术的应用效果更佳,在加快患者术后恢复速度、 减轻瘢痕程度方面作用良好,还可降低并发症发生风险,改善患者的眼睑宽度及眼裂高度,有利于提高美 容满意度。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the effects between the "window method" of orbicularis oculi muscle incision and the traditional Park method for double eyelid surgery. Methods A total of 76 patients who underwent double eyelid surgery in the Department of Aesthetic Surgery of Huamei Aesthetic & Plastic Hospital from February 2024 to May 2025 were selected as the research subjects, and they were divided into the reference group and the experimental group according to the difference in surgical methods, with 38 patients in each group. The reference group received traditional Park method for double eyelid surgery, and the experimental group received the "window method" of orbicularis oculi muscle incision for double eyelid surgery. The surgical related indicators, eyelid status, aesthetic satisfaction and complication rate were compared between the two groups. Results The operation time, suture removal time and postoperative recovery time of the experimental group were shorter than those of the reference group, and the intraoperative blood loss and scar score were lower than those of the reference group (P <0.05). At 7 days after surgery, the palpebral fissure height and levator palpebrae superioris muscle strength of the experimental group were higher than those of the reference group, and the eyelid width was lower than that of the reference group (P <0.05). The aesthetic satisfaction rate of the experimental group (94.74%) was higher than that of the reference group (76.32%) (P <0.05). The incidence of complications in the experimental group (2.63%) was lower than that in the reference group (18.42%) (P <0.05). Conclusion Compared with the traditional Park method for double eyelid surgery, the "window method" of orbicularis oculi muscle incision for double eyelid surgery has a better application effect. It has a good effect on accelerating postoperative recovery and reducing scar severity, can also reduce the risk of complications, improve patients' eyelid width and palpebral fissure height, and is conducive to improving aesthetic satisfaction.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

赵羿杉.眼轮匝肌“窗口法”切开重睑成形术与传统Park法重睑术的效果比较[J].医学美学美容,2025,34(18):85-88.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-11-07
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码