二氧化碳点阵激光技术对面部整形美容患者疼痛情况的影响
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

西安交通大学口腔医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Analysis of VAS score and adverse reactions of patients undergoing facial plastic surgery and aesthetic treatment using fractional laser technology
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:分析点阵激光技术对面部整形美容患者视觉模拟评价量表(VAS)评分及不良反应影响。方法:2022年4月至2025年4月就诊的72例面部整形美容患者,通过随机数字表法分组,常规组(n=36)给予肉毒素注射治疗,治疗组(n=36)给予点阵激光技术治疗,对比两组VAS评分、面部整体美容效果改善分级(GAIS)评分、皮肤指标、不良反应总发生率、患者满意度。结果:与常规组对比,治疗组治疗后VAS评分更低(P<0.05),治疗组治疗后GAIS评分更高(P<0.05)。与常规组治疗后皮肤弹性、皮肤水分对比,治疗组均较高(P<0.05),与常规组治疗后皮肤纹理、皮肤皱纹评分对比,治疗组均较低(P<0.05)。治疗组、常规组不良反应总发生率(16.67%、11.11%)经统计学对比,无差异(P>0.05)。与常规组患者满意度(72.22%)对比,治疗组(94.44%)较高(P<0.05)。结论:点阵激光技术可有效改善面部整形美容患者面部皮肤状况,提高患者满意度,且未出现严重不良反应。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To analyze the impact of fractional laser technology on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and adverse reactions of patients undergoing facial plastic surgery and aesthetic treatment. Methods: From April 2022 to April 2025, 72 patients with facial plastic and aesthetic surgery who visited the hospital were grouped by random number table method. The conventional group (n=36) was treated with botulinum toxin injection, and the treatment group (n=36) was treated with fractional laser technology. The VAS scores, overall facial cosmetic effect improvement (GAIS) scores, skin indicators, total incidence of adverse reactions, and patient satisfaction of the two groups were compared. Results: Compared with the conventional group, the VAS score of the treatment group was lower after treatment (P < 0.05), and the GAIS score of the treatment group was higher after treatment (P < 0.05). Compared with the conventional group, the skin elasticity and skin moisture after treatment in the treatment group were higher (P < 0.05), while the skin texture and skin wrinkle scores after treatment in the conventional group were lower (P < 0.05). The total incidence of adverse reactions in the treatment group and the conventional group (16.67%, 11.11%) was statistically compared, and there was no difference (P>0.05). Compared with the patient satisfaction rate of the conventional group (72.22%), that of the treatment group (94.44%) was higher (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Fractional laser technology can effectively improve the facial skin condition of patients undergoing facial plastic surgery and aesthetic treatment, enhance patient satisfaction, and no serious adverse reactions have occurred.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-19
  • 最后修改日期:2026-02-13
  • 录用日期:2026-02-24
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码